this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Apple

69 readers
1 users here now

A place for Apple news, rumors, and discussions.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't really get how this is a problem since there's pretty simple solution.

Just set your goals to what you want to have as a minimum on an off-day, then on the days you work out you aim for the 200%, 300% or maybe even 400% award.

Mine is set to something achievable even on my off days, but not so low that I'll achieve my goal by laying on the couch all day. Simply because I want to at least move a certain amount even though I'm not working out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I’m with you. People are really stressing about this. The point of the move rings is the encourage a baseline amount of movement and exercise. Anything more is just gravy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If anything I’d say Apple’s only flaw is that they gamified activity/fitness too well. Perhaps the exercise ring should use a different name like Active Minutes, to parallel Stand Hours.

And then in the other hand, if they put in some sort of rest day mechanic, it would shut up the ring addicts. So maybe I should be for it regardless? 🤣

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Mine is set to something achievable even on my off days, but not so low that I'll achieve my goal by laying on the couch all day. Simply because I want to at least move a certain amount even though I'm not working out.

That’s what I do. I’ve set them to a baseline just to make sure I don’t go full sloth. If I’m actually exercising I’m following a specific workout goal. I couldn’t care less about awards. I’m wearing the Watch, not the other way round.

It’s a problem because they’re addicted to closing their rings and collecting awards can’t see it for what it is.