I'd love to see those Hexbears have an answer for this!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

sadness anarcho-comrades shouldn't have exploded bukharin tho, dumbest target selection in history of selections. *And shot lenin

But ussr should have allowed internal factionalism after nep and/or after ww2

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    wasn't Bukharin a W tho

    Hate them for shooting lenin, it was directly instrumental to their death. But the "anarchist" who did that were allied with mostly russian nationalists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Not that much, he was mildly sympathetic to anarchists (closer to lenin, than stalin/trotsky). He was temperating influence i feel, so collectivization may have gone smoother with him being more influential. I have kinda confusing feelings on him, as his theoretical work at first was bleh, but his economic outlook/general aims were more humane

  • source
  • parent