this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
125 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15912 readers
237 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'd love to see those Hexbears have an answer for this!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

sadness anarcho-comrades shouldn't have exploded bukharin tho, dumbest target selection in history of selections. *And shot lenin

But ussr should have allowed internal factionalism after nep and/or after ww2

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Na, should have gone full Stalin until now.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wasn't Bukharin a W tho

Hate them for shooting lenin, it was directly instrumental to their death. But the "anarchist" who did that were allied with mostly russian nationalists.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Not that much, he was mildly sympathetic to anarchists (closer to lenin, than stalin/trotsky). He was temperating influence i feel, so collectivization may have gone smoother with him being more influential. I have kinda confusing feelings on him, as his theoretical work at first was bleh, but his economic outlook/general aims were more humane