Golang

golang@programming.dev

2,749 readers

56 active

1 user here now

This is a community dedicated to the go programming language.

Useful Links:

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to Go
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Try to keep discussions on topic
No spam of tools/companies/advertisements
It’s OK to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the community should not be self-promotion.

founded 3 years ago

moderators

Ategon@programming.dev

austin@programming.dev

RandomDevOpsDude@programming.dev

Rust Vs Go: A Hands-On Comparison (www.shuttle.rs)

submitted 3 years ago by nebiros@programming.dev to c/golang@programming.dev

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Oh no, not another 'Is Rust better than Go?' article. Seriously, haven't we all had our fill of these comparisons by now? But before you sigh in exasperation, hear us out!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

I mean couldnt you say that about any language?

Looks at a standardised language like common lisp

The language itself has been locked for decades, but you've got libraries and compiler instructions that add features like OOP, strict typing, async, etc.

Long live the macro!

There's lots of stuff written in python today that's obsoleted by stuff in the 3.13 alpha

Didn't rust base a lot of its marketing on the promise that there will never be a rust 2, and that all code will be backwards compatible?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago

Didn’t rust base a lot of its marketing on the promise that there will never be a rust 2, and that all code will be backwards compatible?

I think that's Golang, not Rust

permalink

fedilink

source

parent