you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 70 points 2 years ago* (8 children)

There is already an order of magnitude more unused housing than unhoused people- the problem is that the market is involved and that requires winners and losers.

That's why you have people dying of exposure in the richest country in the history of the world. God damn america.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago*

    G-give....away? N-n-no money for me?? But money me, now. Money now. Money! House = money! Empty house, no money is ok, full house no money NOT OK!

    CoMmUnIsM!!!

    -Landleeches

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Land of the free. Free to sleep under any bridge that isn't spiked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    It's off the aggregate numbers. I'm sure that there's a lot of useless suburban sprawl pumping the numbers up. The "most efficient system" is an abject failure when it comes to housing people unless the only metric you care about is revenue generation for shithead inheritors.

  • source
  • parent