805

"the company looked at the history of social media over the past decade and didn’t like what it saw.... existing companies that are only model motivated by profit and just insane user growth, and are willing to tolerate and amplify really toxic content because it looks like engagement... "

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

via hardcoded checks

Yah, I'm going to need a citation on that claim.

[-] 0x0@social.rocketsfall.net -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Edit: Too many people are misunderstanding this post, so I'm removing its contents. To clarify: No checks exist in the current version of Lemmy - these were parts of previous versions.

[-] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

First: They did actually end up removing this and making it configurable, check the bottom of the page. In a vacuum, the idea to stop cut-and-clear racists and trolls from using Lemmy is not something that's too controversial. Sure, they are being hard asses about changing their mind and allowing instance owners to configure it themselves (and I'm glad they changed their mind). But there's a big overlap between passionate and opinionated people, so they have to be at times to ensure a project doesn't devolve into something they can't put your passion into anymore.

Second: I mean... what do you expect? In the issue above they actively encourage people to make their own fork of Lemmy and run that if they don't like something from the base version of Lemmy, so I kind of would assume they do as they preach. Instance owners also have the option to block communities without defederation. Lemmy.ml is basically their home instance. If anything this is a reason not to make an account on lemmy.ml, but as long as that doesn't leak into the source code of Lemmy, who cares?

[-] 0x0@social.rocketsfall.net 2 points 2 years ago

I know they removed it. The post was in reference to Lemmy's development history, not the current source release.

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
805 points (99.3% liked)

Selfhosted

60281 readers
530 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS