▲ 6 ▼ Deleted (google.com) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by anarchost@lemm.ee to c/breadtube@lemmy.world 5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children) Let me ask my dog. permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] anarchost@lemm.ee [S] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Hmm... Should I make it clearer that this is an LGBT person's response to Matt Walsh, and not the Matt Walsh video itself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago No, I got it. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Not allowing his face to be prominently exposed would be the purest ideal. Otherwise, perhaps mark a post as NSFW, so the image would be displayed as blurred. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anarchost@lemm.ee [S] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Hmm... Should I make it clearer that this is an LGBT person's response to Matt Walsh, and not the Matt Walsh video itself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago No, I got it. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Not allowing his face to be prominently exposed would be the purest ideal. Otherwise, perhaps mark a post as NSFW, so the image would be displayed as blurred. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago No, I got it. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Not allowing his face to be prominently exposed would be the purest ideal. Otherwise, perhaps mark a post as NSFW, so the image would be displayed as blurred. permalink fedilink source parent