164
What a third world war would mean for investors (www.economist.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (4 children)

I think a Middle East driven world war could have zero to very few nukes...

Europe driven? Kiss your butt goodbye.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    you're not the real 'poem for your sprog' person. i don't exactly disagree with you, but i wonder why you chose that specific handle. you aren't a poet. what are you doing?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •