Eh, I generally feel like anything aimed at people under 18 in the context of an air bombardment is still not a justifiable murder. I'm with ya, Hamas fucked up. What they did is indefensible, but also taking a life from someone who hasn't even had the opportunity to understand the world and the chance to make those bigger decisions from a grown place yet is very wrong to me.

If it's a battle, back and forth, firing guns, kill or be killed, I guess that's just how it shakes out. I don't expect someone to just let themselves be shot there by a minor (whether they should be there is another story, but ok). But If you just have suspicions this kid is an enemy, or you see them with a gun, or hell you even have solid evidence that kid has been recruited as a child soldier, I don't think you get to judge them with death by bomb outside the moment. That's part of what's so difficult in discussing or defining what constitutes a child soldier or a legitimate target. These kids already got robbed of so much in their ability to live a normal childhood. In America countless black kids were cast as "super predators" in the 90's in much the same way. I respect where your coming from and don't doubt your sincerity but believe we just have a difference of opinion on this matter.

According to this NPR article, the age range both you and the commenter are describing (15-19) represents 10.6% of the male population. The combined totals below them = 40.8% of the population. So what, a fifth = 639 of them in that age range died. Then what percentages of those deaths are militants? Say 50% So 320? Out of 3,195?

Obviously you can't account for distribution and other factors without further info, but still I think that it's more right than it is wrong then by any stretch of the imagination. You've stated similar stuff up the thread but I just don't feel like to cast this as propaganda by numbers manipulation or partial information is a statement that can be taken at face value, given that the lack of numbers and information are a byproduct of intentional suppression by the power committing the offensive.

Hamas is a terrorist group.

Israel isn't an equivalent. Its a fully fledged nation state with sophisticated military and intelligence agency. Israel's behaviour should be measured based on how a nation state should act. Not a terrorist group.

If you think Israel is justified in killing children because Hama's did. Your arguing Israel is a terrorist state, just one your sympathetic to.

I don't think we should compare Israel to the standards we hold for terrorists. Because we don't have any standards for terrorists. Additionally Israel's capability for killing far exceeds what Hamad can achieve.

All the deaths due to the recent Hamas attack is the best Hamas can do. How many people could Israel kill, probably all 2 million in the Gaza strip.

Extremist Christians and extremist Zionists have wanted this for a long time. Only tempered by the west's intolerance for mass killing. Since the Hamas attack the US and UK have both morally approved of moving into to Gaza.