▲ 860 ▼ My Dad Doesn't Know How To Turn Off This Front Camera Heart Feature On His Phone And He Tried To Send Me A Pic Of His New Stove (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 years ago by 1110101010101@reddthat.com to c/oldpeoplefacebook@reddthat.com 95 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (5 children) The EU has very poor safety controls. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago (4 children) Do you have anything to back that up, or just the conversation above that indicates the contrary? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Burner controls on the front. No regulation on toxic chemicals in consumer products. Highest levels of cancer because of toxic chemicals in consumer products than any other region. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I don't understand why you think the controls on the front are a hazard rather than the ones directly behind the hotplates/burners. You must be talking about the PFAS stuff getting legislated on currently. Despite the disappointing u-turn on a blanket ban, they still plan on banning some of the worst offenders. As far as I can tell no other country in the world has banned any at all. The US has phased out manufacturing of some chemicals but still imports and sells products containing those same chemicals. State your source for the "highest levels of cancer because of toxic chemicals in consumer products". Research is only just really beginning on the impact of PFAS, so it would be interesting if you had worldwide data directly connected to their cancer causing impact in humans from consumer products specifically. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The EU makes up only 5% of the world's population but has 23% of all cancer cases. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago Sure, that's a stat, but it's 23% of all new cancer cases. What makes you think that's solely down to toxins in consumer products? There's lifestyle aspects, pollution and population density to add in there. Also two thoughts: I have a gut feeling that the reporting of cancer cases is likely to be higher when health care is free. Additionally, the stat is for Europe and not the EU. EU countries are likely to have more safety regulations than non-EU countries. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago (4 children) Do you have anything to back that up, or just the conversation above that indicates the contrary? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Burner controls on the front. No regulation on toxic chemicals in consumer products. Highest levels of cancer because of toxic chemicals in consumer products than any other region. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I don't understand why you think the controls on the front are a hazard rather than the ones directly behind the hotplates/burners. You must be talking about the PFAS stuff getting legislated on currently. Despite the disappointing u-turn on a blanket ban, they still plan on banning some of the worst offenders. As far as I can tell no other country in the world has banned any at all. The US has phased out manufacturing of some chemicals but still imports and sells products containing those same chemicals. State your source for the "highest levels of cancer because of toxic chemicals in consumer products". Research is only just really beginning on the impact of PFAS, so it would be interesting if you had worldwide data directly connected to their cancer causing impact in humans from consumer products specifically. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The EU makes up only 5% of the world's population but has 23% of all cancer cases. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago Sure, that's a stat, but it's 23% of all new cancer cases. What makes you think that's solely down to toxins in consumer products? There's lifestyle aspects, pollution and population density to add in there. Also two thoughts: I have a gut feeling that the reporting of cancer cases is likely to be higher when health care is free. Additionally, the stat is for Europe and not the EU. EU countries are likely to have more safety regulations than non-EU countries. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (3 children) Burner controls on the front. No regulation on toxic chemicals in consumer products. Highest levels of cancer because of toxic chemicals in consumer products than any other region. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I don't understand why you think the controls on the front are a hazard rather than the ones directly behind the hotplates/burners. You must be talking about the PFAS stuff getting legislated on currently. Despite the disappointing u-turn on a blanket ban, they still plan on banning some of the worst offenders. As far as I can tell no other country in the world has banned any at all. The US has phased out manufacturing of some chemicals but still imports and sells products containing those same chemicals. State your source for the "highest levels of cancer because of toxic chemicals in consumer products". Research is only just really beginning on the impact of PFAS, so it would be interesting if you had worldwide data directly connected to their cancer causing impact in humans from consumer products specifically. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The EU makes up only 5% of the world's population but has 23% of all cancer cases. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago Sure, that's a stat, but it's 23% of all new cancer cases. What makes you think that's solely down to toxins in consumer products? There's lifestyle aspects, pollution and population density to add in there. Also two thoughts: I have a gut feeling that the reporting of cancer cases is likely to be higher when health care is free. Additionally, the stat is for Europe and not the EU. EU countries are likely to have more safety regulations than non-EU countries. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I don't understand why you think the controls on the front are a hazard rather than the ones directly behind the hotplates/burners. You must be talking about the PFAS stuff getting legislated on currently. Despite the disappointing u-turn on a blanket ban, they still plan on banning some of the worst offenders. As far as I can tell no other country in the world has banned any at all. The US has phased out manufacturing of some chemicals but still imports and sells products containing those same chemicals. State your source for the "highest levels of cancer because of toxic chemicals in consumer products". Research is only just really beginning on the impact of PFAS, so it would be interesting if you had worldwide data directly connected to their cancer causing impact in humans from consumer products specifically. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The EU makes up only 5% of the world's population but has 23% of all cancer cases. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago Sure, that's a stat, but it's 23% of all new cancer cases. What makes you think that's solely down to toxins in consumer products? There's lifestyle aspects, pollution and population density to add in there. Also two thoughts: I have a gut feeling that the reporting of cancer cases is likely to be higher when health care is free. Additionally, the stat is for Europe and not the EU. EU countries are likely to have more safety regulations than non-EU countries. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The EU makes up only 5% of the world's population but has 23% of all cancer cases. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago Sure, that's a stat, but it's 23% of all new cancer cases. What makes you think that's solely down to toxins in consumer products? There's lifestyle aspects, pollution and population density to add in there. Also two thoughts: I have a gut feeling that the reporting of cancer cases is likely to be higher when health care is free. Additionally, the stat is for Europe and not the EU. EU countries are likely to have more safety regulations than non-EU countries. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 1 point 2 years ago Sure, that's a stat, but it's 23% of all new cancer cases. What makes you think that's solely down to toxins in consumer products? There's lifestyle aspects, pollution and population density to add in there. Also two thoughts: I have a gut feeling that the reporting of cancer cases is likely to be higher when health care is free. Additionally, the stat is for Europe and not the EU. EU countries are likely to have more safety regulations than non-EU countries. permalink fedilink source parent