this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
37 points (97.4% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
474 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A pair of Conservative MPs will try to compel a CBC executive and a journalism standards director to appear before a House of Commons committee to defend the company's language guide β€” which discourages the use of the words "terrorism" and "terrorists" when describing attacks and their perpetrators.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"It is worth remembering that the independence of CBC/Radio-Canada's journalism from the government and Parliament is protected in law, in the Broadcasting Act," Mar said.

Sure, there have been a few incidents proving the contrary.

Lantsman said the CBC doesn't have "journalistic integrity" because "if you can't call people who murder the elderly, kidnap children, rape women and kill entire families terrorists, then I don't think it's worth funding."

If you force them to change their language rules, is that giving them more integrity.

This isn't their first rodeo over this question...

https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/ombudsman/reviews/use-of-the-word-terrorist

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Also, by those standards, they'd have to call the CPC's base - and likely some oft heir MPs - terrorists, and I doubt they'll like that.