628
22 Democrats Sponsor a Bill That Could Censor Abortion Info From the Internet (jezebel.com)
submitted 3 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

22 Democrats Sponsor a Bill That Could Censor Abortion Info From the Internet::The Kids Online Safety Act is “a blank check” for Republican AGs to "intimidate any way they can," a digital civil liberties advocate told Jezebel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 45 points 3 years ago (10 children)

Slowly and slowly, it feels like parents are having less and less responsibility—and therefore control—over their children's lives. Information is not a problem—if there's something the parent doesn't want the kid to see it up to them to enforce that, not the government.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    Its cause a lot of parents don't want responsibility.

    They want teachers and tablets and cellphones to raise the kids, not themselves.

    We should be cracking down on shitty parents, not passing censorship laws that will be grossly misused by the obvious actors.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Parents need to be restricting their children's use of the internet. I barely "used" the internet in the sense of interacting and posting until college. That's much harder in this day now. I wasn't even all that long ago I was in high school either. The real challenge now are phones and tablets. It's a lot harder to control what your kids do online. All kinds of devices have web browsers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Absolutely not. Free access to the Internet and a public library as a kid was crucial to my development. I was raised by a bunch of strict Christians who tried to stop us from reading Harry Potter, for Pete's sake (it had witchcraft in it). I am completely against any censoring of information in the name of 'protecting' children from 'harmful' information. You know what I did as a kid when I came across something I was uncomfortable with? I put it down and found something else to read. Kids are fully capable of making that call themselves. I'm not sure why everyone acts like they can't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    Children are not mature enough to determine what they should have access to. Your parents kept you away from blatant racism. Children should not have access to ISIS videos. That sort of thing will screw them up for life.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    A parent's job is not to shield children from life. It's to prepare them for life. You shouldn't try to keep them from ever falling over. You just need to be there to pick them back up afterward. The more you let them engage with the world, with your support, the more mature they will become. Maturity isn't something you magically acquire, it's the direct result of confronting difficult things.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago

    Part of being responsible means preventing children from doing things that will kill them or fuck them for life. Teenagers, especially boys, have a very bad tendency to seek out shock content. Facebook moderators literally have PTSD from seeing terrorism and CSAM.

    Children need to be protected from certain things and anyone who doesn't realize that is still a petulant child because they were given common sense restrictions by their parents.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Is a parent shitty if, for example, their kids see stuff on the device another kid brought to school and shows around? Or when they visit a friend and their older sibling shows the kids something?

    You all sound like 20 year olds with little life experience who believe you know how parenting works, when in actuality you have 0 idea about it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago

    Well, I've parented three children, so no.

    Also— there is no reality in which a parent can completely control everything a child sees / interacts with. Nor should they, that's not a healthy growing environment. Neither is one where the government does the same. And I don't think they would by doing this—it would be just as successful as a parent trying. Because laws prohibiting stuff doesn't make them disappear, people would still talk about stuff, and your child would still be mildly exposed in some way.

    My point was that if a parent wants to try to limit what their child sees, that's their prerogative. I do not, however, think it's the government's.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent