▲ 628 ▼ 22 Democrats Sponsor a Bill That Could Censor Abortion Info From the Internet (jezebel.com) submitted 3 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 89 comments fedilink hide all child comments 22 Democrats Sponsor a Bill That Could Censor Abortion Info From the Internet::The Kids Online Safety Act is “a blank check” for Republican AGs to "intimidate any way they can," a digital civil liberties advocate told Jezebel.
[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (2 children) "Good reasons" for the people in power. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floppade@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago In a literal level, this person is not being unreasonable. Facebook moderators and the psychological conditions they face as a result of their work are a good indication of that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago You are right, most of it is probably to keep people in power and the servants in line, but there are also a lot of situations in which we actively ask for censorship. Moderators are needed for a reason. Censorship is our only relatively effective tool to counter disinformation campaigns and fake news. Even search engines censor their results either to avoid lawsuits or to prevent certain situations, like someone asking for suicide methods is redirected to sites telling him why life is worth it. I still understand this is a double edged sword and im not sure if the risks involved with compulsory censorship are worth losing our internet freedom, but I do understand this shit is needed on certain situations permalink fedilink source parent
[–] floppade@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago In a literal level, this person is not being unreasonable. Facebook moderators and the psychological conditions they face as a result of their work are a good indication of that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago You are right, most of it is probably to keep people in power and the servants in line, but there are also a lot of situations in which we actively ask for censorship. Moderators are needed for a reason. Censorship is our only relatively effective tool to counter disinformation campaigns and fake news. Even search engines censor their results either to avoid lawsuits or to prevent certain situations, like someone asking for suicide methods is redirected to sites telling him why life is worth it. I still understand this is a double edged sword and im not sure if the risks involved with compulsory censorship are worth losing our internet freedom, but I do understand this shit is needed on certain situations permalink fedilink source parent