▲ 781 ▼ “Yeah, they’re gone”: Musk confirms cuts to X’s election integrity team — “‘Election Integrity’ Team.. was undermining election integrity,” Musk writes (arstechnica.com) submitted 3 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 156 comments fedilink hide all child comments “Yeah, they’re gone”: Musk confirms cuts to X’s election integrity team — “‘Election Integrity’ Team.. was undermining election integrity,” Musk writes::"'Election Integrity' Team... was undermining election integrity," Musk writes.
[+] Xatolos@reddthat.com -24 points 3 years ago (12 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] lorty@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 years ago (2 children) That's an interesting way to say you don't know what the fediverse is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Xatolos@reddthat.com -4 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago It literally has all the federation features removed. By definition it isn't part of the fediverse, because it's not federating anything If I set up my own mastodon server, but blocked literally all federation, then my server wouldn't be part of the fediverse. It's a bit odd that this has to be elaborated on permalink fedilink source parent [–] gsfraley@lemmy.world 16 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's not...? It's literally just another social media site, it doesn't hook into ActivityPub or any cross-broadcast protocol. I don't know why you're throwing around the word "fediverse" here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago It is a fork of Mastodon though, iirc. But I don't think it federates with anything. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 15 points 3 years ago (3 children) This is a very strange comparison, considering Truth Social is not owned by any government. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Xatolos@reddthat.com -8 points 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don't think @onlineperson meant this as "host their own social network", but as "host their own micro-messaging platform to release news which is part of the fediverse". This would make them resilient against PoS like Musk, while making their news accessible to a wide variety of users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 3 years ago Exactly what I mean. The Netherlands has one, Germany too, and even the European Union, but it isn't their major presence and IMO, it should be. permalink fedilink source parent [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 15 points 3 years ago (2 children) Nah, more like this https://social.network.europa.eu/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mp3@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) Same for news organizations. Give the option for reporters that leave or join the organization to migrate their account (aka keep their followers). That way they provide a proof of authenticity for their reporters by being hosted on their Mastodon instance. Obviously, the instance shouldn't let the public create an account there, only follow from another instance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 3 years ago That does make a lot of sense! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 years ago (2 children) That's an interesting way to say you don't know what the fediverse is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Xatolos@reddthat.com -4 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago It literally has all the federation features removed. By definition it isn't part of the fediverse, because it's not federating anything If I set up my own mastodon server, but blocked literally all federation, then my server wouldn't be part of the fediverse. It's a bit odd that this has to be elaborated on permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Xatolos@reddthat.com -4 points 3 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago It literally has all the federation features removed. By definition it isn't part of the fediverse, because it's not federating anything If I set up my own mastodon server, but blocked literally all federation, then my server wouldn't be part of the fediverse. It's a bit odd that this has to be elaborated on permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 years ago It literally has all the federation features removed. By definition it isn't part of the fediverse, because it's not federating anything If I set up my own mastodon server, but blocked literally all federation, then my server wouldn't be part of the fediverse. It's a bit odd that this has to be elaborated on permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gsfraley@lemmy.world 16 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's not...? It's literally just another social media site, it doesn't hook into ActivityPub or any cross-broadcast protocol. I don't know why you're throwing around the word "fediverse" here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago It is a fork of Mastodon though, iirc. But I don't think it federates with anything. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 1 point 3 years ago It is a fork of Mastodon though, iirc. But I don't think it federates with anything. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 15 points 3 years ago (3 children) This is a very strange comparison, considering Truth Social is not owned by any government. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Xatolos@reddthat.com -8 points 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don't think @onlineperson meant this as "host their own social network", but as "host their own micro-messaging platform to release news which is part of the fediverse". This would make them resilient against PoS like Musk, while making their news accessible to a wide variety of users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 3 years ago Exactly what I mean. The Netherlands has one, Germany too, and even the European Union, but it isn't their major presence and IMO, it should be. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Xatolos@reddthat.com -8 points 3 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don't think @onlineperson meant this as "host their own social network", but as "host their own micro-messaging platform to release news which is part of the fediverse". This would make them resilient against PoS like Musk, while making their news accessible to a wide variety of users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 3 years ago Exactly what I mean. The Netherlands has one, Germany too, and even the European Union, but it isn't their major presence and IMO, it should be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don't think @onlineperson meant this as "host their own social network", but as "host their own micro-messaging platform to release news which is part of the fediverse". This would make them resilient against PoS like Musk, while making their news accessible to a wide variety of users. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 3 years ago Exactly what I mean. The Netherlands has one, Germany too, and even the European Union, but it isn't their major presence and IMO, it should be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 3 years ago Exactly what I mean. The Netherlands has one, Germany too, and even the European Union, but it isn't their major presence and IMO, it should be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 15 points 3 years ago (2 children) Nah, more like this https://social.network.europa.eu/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mp3@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) Same for news organizations. Give the option for reporters that leave or join the organization to migrate their account (aka keep their followers). That way they provide a proof of authenticity for their reporters by being hosted on their Mastodon instance. Obviously, the instance shouldn't let the public create an account there, only follow from another instance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 3 years ago That does make a lot of sense! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 years ago (1 child) Same for news organizations. Give the option for reporters that leave or join the organization to migrate their account (aka keep their followers). That way they provide a proof of authenticity for their reporters by being hosted on their Mastodon instance. Obviously, the instance shouldn't let the public create an account there, only follow from another instance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 3 years ago That does make a lot of sense! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 3 years ago That does make a lot of sense! permalink fedilink source parent