▲ 0 ▼ OpenAI being Sued for "Stealing" Peoples Content Online (www.firstpost.com) submitted 3 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 9 comments fedilink hide all child comments OpenAI's ChatGPT and Sam Altman are in massive trouble. OpenAI is getting sued in the US for illegally using content from the internet to train their LLM or large language models
[–] cyd@vlemmy.net 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) That's not at all how the GPL works.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] inspxtr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) can you expand on that? I’m not very familiar with the legal aspect of GPL. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wander@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you release code under gpl, and I modify it, I'm required to release those modifications publicly under gpl as well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] inspxtr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) so if content is under GPL and used for training data, how far is the process of training/fine-tuning considered “modification”? For example, if I scrape a bunch of blog posts and just try to use tools to analyze the language, does that considered “modification”? What is the minimum solution that OpenAI should do (or should have done) here, does it stop at making the code for processing the data public, or the entire code base? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wander@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago I'm not sure. And I'm not sure there's legal precedant for that either. That's why I dont have a problem with any of these lawsuits, it gives us clarity on the legal aspects, whichever way it goes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] inspxtr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) can you expand on that? I’m not very familiar with the legal aspect of GPL. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wander@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you release code under gpl, and I modify it, I'm required to release those modifications publicly under gpl as well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] inspxtr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) so if content is under GPL and used for training data, how far is the process of training/fine-tuning considered “modification”? For example, if I scrape a bunch of blog posts and just try to use tools to analyze the language, does that considered “modification”? What is the minimum solution that OpenAI should do (or should have done) here, does it stop at making the code for processing the data public, or the entire code base? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wander@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago I'm not sure. And I'm not sure there's legal precedant for that either. That's why I dont have a problem with any of these lawsuits, it gives us clarity on the legal aspects, whichever way it goes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Wander@kbin.social 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you release code under gpl, and I modify it, I'm required to release those modifications publicly under gpl as well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] inspxtr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) so if content is under GPL and used for training data, how far is the process of training/fine-tuning considered “modification”? For example, if I scrape a bunch of blog posts and just try to use tools to analyze the language, does that considered “modification”? What is the minimum solution that OpenAI should do (or should have done) here, does it stop at making the code for processing the data public, or the entire code base? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wander@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago I'm not sure. And I'm not sure there's legal precedant for that either. That's why I dont have a problem with any of these lawsuits, it gives us clarity on the legal aspects, whichever way it goes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] inspxtr@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) so if content is under GPL and used for training data, how far is the process of training/fine-tuning considered “modification”? For example, if I scrape a bunch of blog posts and just try to use tools to analyze the language, does that considered “modification”? What is the minimum solution that OpenAI should do (or should have done) here, does it stop at making the code for processing the data public, or the entire code base? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wander@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago I'm not sure. And I'm not sure there's legal precedant for that either. That's why I dont have a problem with any of these lawsuits, it gives us clarity on the legal aspects, whichever way it goes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Wander@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago I'm not sure. And I'm not sure there's legal precedant for that either. That's why I dont have a problem with any of these lawsuits, it gives us clarity on the legal aspects, whichever way it goes. permalink fedilink source parent