▲ 125 ▼ So, where do we go now? (www.theverge.com) submitted 3 years ago by Tyfud@lemmy.one to c/technology@lemmy.world 84 comments fedilink hide all child comments Not sure I agree with all of his points, but it's a start that we're at least publicly acknowledging this as the end of an era (for good IMO)
[–] Tyfud@lemmy.one [S] 0 points 3 years ago (9 children) Assuming Facebook doesn't get ahold of this... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (8 children) They can get ahold of their own instance and people can ignore it. That’s what’s great about the fediverse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Tyfud@lemmy.one [S] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Unless they pull an EEE. Which they absolutely would. The fediverse admins all over would need to be vigilant and refuse Facebook access to the fediverse, otherwise we'll get extinguished, just like XMPP permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago Agreed. Defederate Facebook as you would any toxic instance. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CataclysmZA@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago That's not a realistic proposal if Facebook volunteers dev resources to improve and support ActivityPub and we grow to rely on that. In the same way that Google co-opted the W3C to now just accept Chrome as the default, I can see something similar happen if Threads really kicks off and has a ton of effort put into it. It's a lot more grey than you'd expect given the absurd resources that nation states have compiled to try and usurp Google's dominance, but all the same I'd rather not have the internet rely on something made by a publicly traded company that cuts projects on a whim. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago (4 children) We'll just have to hope the average person has wised up enough that they wont get signups in the millions just because they're Meta. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] capital@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (2 children) One puff piece by a popular site/magazine with a title like "You've heard of the fediverse, now it's easy to join" and people will trip over themselves to sign up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) ...log in with facebook/instagram. I can see it already... D: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jalda@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago You don't need to see it. It is already confirmed that they will use Instagram accounts for login. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Maybe. Or maybe the average person can use Meta’s decentralized instance and the non-average can use the smaller, less popular one. I’m down with that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago (8 children) They can get ahold of their own instance and people can ignore it. That’s what’s great about the fediverse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Tyfud@lemmy.one [S] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Unless they pull an EEE. Which they absolutely would. The fediverse admins all over would need to be vigilant and refuse Facebook access to the fediverse, otherwise we'll get extinguished, just like XMPP permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago Agreed. Defederate Facebook as you would any toxic instance. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CataclysmZA@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago That's not a realistic proposal if Facebook volunteers dev resources to improve and support ActivityPub and we grow to rely on that. In the same way that Google co-opted the W3C to now just accept Chrome as the default, I can see something similar happen if Threads really kicks off and has a ton of effort put into it. It's a lot more grey than you'd expect given the absurd resources that nation states have compiled to try and usurp Google's dominance, but all the same I'd rather not have the internet rely on something made by a publicly traded company that cuts projects on a whim. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago (4 children) We'll just have to hope the average person has wised up enough that they wont get signups in the millions just because they're Meta. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] capital@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (2 children) One puff piece by a popular site/magazine with a title like "You've heard of the fediverse, now it's easy to join" and people will trip over themselves to sign up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) ...log in with facebook/instagram. I can see it already... D: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jalda@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago You don't need to see it. It is already confirmed that they will use Instagram accounts for login. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Maybe. Or maybe the average person can use Meta’s decentralized instance and the non-average can use the smaller, less popular one. I’m down with that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tyfud@lemmy.one [S] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Unless they pull an EEE. Which they absolutely would. The fediverse admins all over would need to be vigilant and refuse Facebook access to the fediverse, otherwise we'll get extinguished, just like XMPP permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago Agreed. Defederate Facebook as you would any toxic instance. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CataclysmZA@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago That's not a realistic proposal if Facebook volunteers dev resources to improve and support ActivityPub and we grow to rely on that. In the same way that Google co-opted the W3C to now just accept Chrome as the default, I can see something similar happen if Threads really kicks off and has a ton of effort put into it. It's a lot more grey than you'd expect given the absurd resources that nation states have compiled to try and usurp Google's dominance, but all the same I'd rather not have the internet rely on something made by a publicly traded company that cuts projects on a whim. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago Agreed. Defederate Facebook as you would any toxic instance. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CataclysmZA@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago That's not a realistic proposal if Facebook volunteers dev resources to improve and support ActivityPub and we grow to rely on that. In the same way that Google co-opted the W3C to now just accept Chrome as the default, I can see something similar happen if Threads really kicks off and has a ton of effort put into it. It's a lot more grey than you'd expect given the absurd resources that nation states have compiled to try and usurp Google's dominance, but all the same I'd rather not have the internet rely on something made by a publicly traded company that cuts projects on a whim. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago (4 children) We'll just have to hope the average person has wised up enough that they wont get signups in the millions just because they're Meta. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] capital@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (2 children) One puff piece by a popular site/magazine with a title like "You've heard of the fediverse, now it's easy to join" and people will trip over themselves to sign up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) ...log in with facebook/instagram. I can see it already... D: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jalda@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago You don't need to see it. It is already confirmed that they will use Instagram accounts for login. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Maybe. Or maybe the average person can use Meta’s decentralized instance and the non-average can use the smaller, less popular one. I’m down with that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] capital@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (2 children) One puff piece by a popular site/magazine with a title like "You've heard of the fediverse, now it's easy to join" and people will trip over themselves to sign up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) ...log in with facebook/instagram. I can see it already... D: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jalda@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago You don't need to see it. It is already confirmed that they will use Instagram accounts for login. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) ...log in with facebook/instagram. I can see it already... D: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] jalda@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago You don't need to see it. It is already confirmed that they will use Instagram accounts for login. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jalda@sopuli.xyz 1 point 3 years ago You don't need to see it. It is already confirmed that they will use Instagram accounts for login. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Maybe. Or maybe the average person can use Meta’s decentralized instance and the non-average can use the smaller, less popular one. I’m down with that. permalink fedilink source parent