853
Remember when NFTs sold for millions of dollars? 95% of the digital collectibles are now probably worthless. (markets.businessinsider.com)
submitted 3 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
288 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Remember when NFTs sold for millions of dollars? 95% of the digital collectibles are now probably worthless.::NFTs had a huge bull run two years ago, with billions of dollars per month in trading volume, but now most have crashed to zero, a study found.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 years ago (6 children)

But NFTs are not necessary to make that work. The reason it has never been done wasn't technical, it was that it simply wasn't a good idea.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    It might be overkill, but the whole point is that you want to have a distributed record of ownership. Something that no single company can control and that can survive companies going out of business and disappearing. There aren't very many alternatives that can accomplish that and even less that are ready to use right now and not just hypothetical.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (4 children)

    Why distributed? Ownership is ultimately up to governments, as it's something that would be decided in a court. So, what's the advantage to having distributed records instead of just a government database?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    That distributed database exists and has been up and running for years. That government database is purely hypothetical. There would also be the question of which government is going to run it? Does each government run their own? Does one get exclusive control over the database that contains all digital purchases?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    That distributed database exists and has been up and running for years.

    But is an environmental catastrophe and has no legal value.

    There would also be the question of which government is going to run it?

    Every government would have to run their own, because every government gets to decide ownership within their own borders. Think of patents. Who owns the worldwide international patent database? Nobody, there is no such thing because each country decides on the validity of patents within their own borders. Now, there are patent treaties and things, but fundamentally if a patent dispute happens in France, it's the French courts who decide using the French patents database.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent