you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 86 points 3 years ago* (10 children)

Commutes are part of the work day if the employer does not allow WFH. How else is the employee supposed to show up for work?

There is no reason to debate, it's clear as day. But the greedy, rich assholes on the reins think everyone should be honored to waste their lives working under them.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago

    Commutes are part of the work day if the employer does not allow WFH. How else is the employee supposed to show up for work?

    This.

    Our country went mostly work-from-home for over a year, and people were more productive, not less. If you're going to inconvenience your work force unnecessarily then you should pay for it, absolutely.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    That means we'll just stop hiring people who live far away, even in the person is willing to make the commute.

    No change from the status quo. As it stands, employees move next to their workplace because nobody is ok with a 4-hour commute. It's impossible even if you give up on social life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)