you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 74 points 3 years ago (60 children)
  • [–] 52 points 3 years ago (18 children)

    $10 a month to have basically every song ever and never have to worry about YouTube ads. Yes, I use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 years ago (11 children)

    hah, this was me with Grooveshark.

    and then I lost everything when it shut down.

    and then me again with Google play music. "upload your music, we'll keep it for you"

    and then I lost everything when it shut down.

    "oh it's ok, you can just use [new service], it's better anyway"

    it just isn't the same, you lose stuff everytime. I don't think it's worth it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    and then me again with Google play music. "upload your music, we'll keep it for you"

    and then I lost everything when it shut down.

    There was a long period where you could transfer your GPM uploads to YTM.

    It worked perfectly for me - all my previously uploaded music is in my Library under "Uploads".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago*

    You can still upload up to 100,000 tracks, I believe.

    Though I've not personally tried to do a bulk upload since before it changed from GPM, so I don't know if there's still library import tools available to help with that

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Grooveshark. Now that's a name that I really miss. I'll never stop being mad about that site being taken down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    this hit me hard on multiple levels. There was a lot of live performances and remixes on Grooveshark that just don't exist anymore.

    But, I also lived where they were headquartered. They had started a "Grooveshark university" for local programmers to learn the ropes and it was really cool. I was self-taught but learned a lot from that experience. Such a shame

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago*

    I actually met employees from the company at a conference years ago and knew people that worked there off and on. It was a pretty toxic environment and the management was basically a frat party. The office had an in-house chef for a while before they had to tighten the purse strings due to the multitude of lawsuits they were getting hit with (most of which I learned came from Sony BMG). Their team of lawyers basically worked around the clock. They also underpaid devs but had an array of talent from every level that allowed people to cut their teeth and work on some cool UI.

    I used to have a ton of stuff on Grooveshark and had stuff shared to me (and vice versa) from others. It was a cool UI even if it was a little clunky at times. Great place to find obscure stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    There's apps to sync your stuff when you move to another platform. It won't be perfectand certain features on certain apps are paywalled, but you should get a fairly acceptable copy of your content after using a service like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 31 points 3 years ago* (6 children)

    YouTube Music is a much better option than Spotify, in my opinion.

    On top of the music you get ad-free YouTube.

    I also upload any music I buy via Bandcamp or physical CD so I can listen to it anywhere. No one else offers that as far as I know.

    Just make sure you use the unofficial YouTube Music desktop app (http://ytmdesktop.app/) if you're on a PC because using it in a browser sucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (5 children)

    in theory i agree, but i could not stand the UI when i tried youtube premium, compared to spotify which is just seamless

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    6 family members for $15 a month and no YouTube ads. Also that money was basically paid for by Google Rewards. The Web App is good too. I don't have to deal with CEF/Electron or any install really.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    The Web site says $24 for 5 members. Is it different per location? How do you pay less?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    Yeah, sorry that was bumped up recently though I was grandfathered for a long while. But that was the impetus for getting it back when it was just GPM.

    It's 6 actually (1+ 5 other members). My uncle basically paid for half of it.

    It's $22.99 for me now which includes YouTube Premium. Just YouTube Music (for 6) is $16.99. Individual $10.99 and Student $5.49.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    I don't use YouTube Music but I love using YouTube for my music. Tons of songs on there that just aren't on either YouTube music or other services like Spotify.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    You can listen to just the music that's on YouTube via YouTube music. That's one of the main reasons why I'm using YouTube music.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago*

    Yeah, I switced to YouTube music when Google Play music went away because that's where I stored all of my music at. But The category is massive, especially for niche songs and you can choose to watch the video or just listen to the song, Also with a lot of the songs you can look at the lyrics in real time while the music's playing and that's kind of nice. Also ad free YT is nice.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    For me, every other music app is missing alot of the songs I want to listen to (Cover songs, and remixes are the big 2) and they are only available on yt music.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    Same + foreign artists. Lots of J-Rock artists that are hard to find on Western music services, let alone other countries. Only stuff like K-Pop I can find consistently on Western music services just because of how in demand it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    Soundcloud might be an alternative worth looking into. For the music I tend to search for, I find I'm more likely to find it on Soundcloud, and it can take years to migrate from SC to YTM.

    While YTM and SC were both $10, putting up with the worse platform was a reasonable price for no YT ads. Now that the grandfathering is ending and the price is jumping to $14, for US folks, I'm feeling the pressure to migrate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Totally. I was already in the ecosystem so it was only natural I go to Music when it was available. Is it better than Spotify? Shrug. Just different.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Spotify has invested significant $$ in upgrading their platform.

    YTM lets you access user-uploaded content. With that comes more in the way of remixes and Indy artists. The platform itself is pretty dogshit, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Only because I get both YT Premium and YT Music for cheap ($4/month).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    Revanced, yeah. Still sucks when you're looking for an album and all of the songs are from the official channel except for one that some schlub uploaded which repeats the previous track as an intro, has the levels maxed across all channels and sounds like it was recorded with a USB lapel mic in a paper bag

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago*

    I do because I pay next to nothing for a family membership, I can access YouTube covers and music normally unaccessible in my region (yeah, that happens!) and it works with Android Auto which my father needs (otherwise I would simply use Revanced). Also could never learn Spotify, it's so counter-intuitive to me

  • source
  • parent