▲ 692 ▼ Christian roulette (feddit.de) submitted 3 years ago by atheist@feddit.de [M] to c/atheism@feddit.de 89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (4 children) You seem to feign ignorance a lot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago (3 children) Is my point not valid, that ultimately you cannot go into the bible pick a random page and act it out, it’s physically not possible for a large amount of pages. You didn’t even attempt to correct my view although I asked you to explain it if your viewpoint was any different. I genuinely want to know how you see this post if you understand it differently to how I do. Because to me, my understanding is the only one that can logically be drawn from this post. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) My point is you are disingenuous while trying to make your real point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you do not want to explain yourself to me then fine, make your single sentence reply that contains 10-20 words saying nothing at all. I gave you everything that I was seeing and you give me “you bad” in return. There is no point in trying to find out more from someone who acts this way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago You're mistaking quantity for quality. You were pretending that the scenario was just reading the passage. You were pretending that you didn't know I was talking about the post I had directly replied to. You are disingenuous and dishonest so as you put it yes "you bad". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] senoro@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago (3 children) Is my point not valid, that ultimately you cannot go into the bible pick a random page and act it out, it’s physically not possible for a large amount of pages. You didn’t even attempt to correct my view although I asked you to explain it if your viewpoint was any different. I genuinely want to know how you see this post if you understand it differently to how I do. Because to me, my understanding is the only one that can logically be drawn from this post. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) My point is you are disingenuous while trying to make your real point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you do not want to explain yourself to me then fine, make your single sentence reply that contains 10-20 words saying nothing at all. I gave you everything that I was seeing and you give me “you bad” in return. There is no point in trying to find out more from someone who acts this way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago You're mistaking quantity for quality. You were pretending that the scenario was just reading the passage. You were pretending that you didn't know I was talking about the post I had directly replied to. You are disingenuous and dishonest so as you put it yes "you bad". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) My point is you are disingenuous while trying to make your real point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] senoro@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you do not want to explain yourself to me then fine, make your single sentence reply that contains 10-20 words saying nothing at all. I gave you everything that I was seeing and you give me “you bad” in return. There is no point in trying to find out more from someone who acts this way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago You're mistaking quantity for quality. You were pretending that the scenario was just reading the passage. You were pretending that you didn't know I was talking about the post I had directly replied to. You are disingenuous and dishonest so as you put it yes "you bad". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] senoro@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) If you do not want to explain yourself to me then fine, make your single sentence reply that contains 10-20 words saying nothing at all. I gave you everything that I was seeing and you give me “you bad” in return. There is no point in trying to find out more from someone who acts this way. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago You're mistaking quantity for quality. You were pretending that the scenario was just reading the passage. You were pretending that you didn't know I was talking about the post I had directly replied to. You are disingenuous and dishonest so as you put it yes "you bad". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago You're mistaking quantity for quality. You were pretending that the scenario was just reading the passage. You were pretending that you didn't know I was talking about the post I had directly replied to. You are disingenuous and dishonest so as you put it yes "you bad". permalink fedilink source parent