this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
32 points (83.3% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

807 readers
123 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It makes sense that they won't allow their own skin to be ravaged (United States, Britain, Germany, France etc), but why not the Baltics and Poland, at this point?

I'm surprised they haven't done so, after these long months

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In other words, they didn’t help the United Kingdom during the Falklands/Malvinas

Argentina attacked then and there's article 6, looks like it's explicitly written so that NATO countries didn't had obligations to participate into each other's colonial wars.