32
Why won't they send in more NATO countries, after these months, to help Ukraine regain land from Russia? (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml to c/asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It makes sense that they won't allow their own skin to be ravaged (United States, Britain, Germany, France etc), but why not the Baltics and Poland, at this point?

I'm surprised they haven't done so, after these long months

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zepheriths@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

NATO didn't send troops. Infact if you look at who supports who in the civil war, there are NATO members on both sides

[-] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just to clarify, you are talking of the first civil war, right? Also, they may have not sent ground troops, but they certainly sent air support, through no fly zone and aerial bombings of the country.

Search the Brega dam bombing over here. https://theecologist.org/2015/may/14/war-crime-nato-deliberately-destroyed-libyas-water-infrastructure

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
32 points (83.3% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

1258 readers
78 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Shaggy0291@lemmygrad.ml
GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml
SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml
QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
yogthos@lemmygrad.ml