32
Why won't they send in more NATO countries, after these months, to help Ukraine regain land from Russia? (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by to c/asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It makes sense that they won't allow their own skin to be ravaged (United States, Britain, Germany, France etc), but why not the Baltics and Poland, at this point?

I'm surprised they haven't done so, after these long months

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 3 years ago (4 children)

Because sending in a NATO country would start a new world war.

And NATO has no interest in doing that, they just want Ukrainians to die for making Russia weaker.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 12 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I mean, we could say the same of the Korean War, but that didn't stop the U.S from bombing the hell out of the DPRK...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    drpk tested it's first nuke in the 2000's, the us invaded in the 50's thinking it would be a easy campaign since the country was recovering from japanese occupation, the general heading the campaign even fucking asked to deploy nukes on drpk

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •