you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 21 hours ago* (6 children)

But how is requiring explicit approval (meaning it's not something that is typically allowed) considered "permissive"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 16 hours ago

    The wording is weird. But the project (openslop) defines permissive as basically having a path for AI to enter the code. This lumps together both measured approaches like NetBSD's and fully embracing slop contributions in the same category.

    I think this only makes sense if you view AI contributions as a taint, something that threatens the licensing of a project. In that optic, it really is an all or nothing. But it doesn't help users choose among the options as much.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 20 hours ago (3 children)

    Do those two commits count as “increasingly”?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

    There were more commits, the scanner basically checks the most recent history and stops, just to confirm that the project still allows LLMs. I don't have a laptop or good internet right now to clone the entire repo and grep logs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 20 hours ago* (1 child)

    Before I refreshed it there were 4 flagged commits, all from September 1st. Since then there was one new LLM-assisted commit so it looks like the rate is decreasing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 19 hours ago

    That is good to know. I've also just checked the commits, and now I'm unsure if the LLM-related lines actually signified LLM use or just were copied from updated software changelogs. I will remove my above comment and stop with this topic until I learn more.

  • source
  • parent