you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 days ago (1 child)

Not to disagree exactly, but to speak on the point of millions: If every worker in the US was a millionaire, it would almost certainly mean absurd amounts of inflation has happened and the millions don't mean much. I don't think the capitalists would allow most people to have that kind of money in its current worth because then they'd be able to put it into electoral PACs and such, and have more of a chance to get their interests represented. So keeping most relatively weak in spending power is part of how the system keeps the capitalists in power while being able to maintain the illusion of possible representation for the working class through narratives about getting out and voting (fine print: voting for the candidates the capitalists picked as options). If it came down to it, they could assert the power in other ways (e.g. by force) but it's easier if people genuinely believe in the electoral system as a means of getting seen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    I meant millionaire in the colloquial sense, as I meant more to imply every worker magically coming into obscene wealth relative to every other worker on the planet. But I understand what you mean.

    On the topic of PACs and so forth, the worker buying into the system wouldn't accomplish much if every single element of the system is already bought, paid for, and under capitalist control. The capitalist class would simply fall back on obscene amounts of regulatory capture or require additional barriers to entry to prohibit proletarian participation in the electoral system.

  • source
  • parent