I understand that it does not mean

this doesn’t mean 73% of populations are in decline; in fact, around half of the studied populations were in decline, while half were either increasing or stable.

Maybe I should ask why the LPI report uses such a weird number instead?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 1 point 2 days ago

I appreciate this reply with the exception that it doesn't discuss geometric vs linear average, but perhaps I'm just thinking of %'s badly?

  • source
  • parent