you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And the US has done all of that, dropped millions of tons of bombs on civilians, and worse, lol.

It is objectively good for the US to lose power and for China to gain power, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    This doesn't have to be a simple dualism, there is a third option ie. it would be better for the US to lose power and others (not China) to gain power. The more equally power is distributed in the world the better a shot we have at balance. The last thing the world needs is a "G2".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    When did I say either one was good. Re-read my original comment. My point was for independent power, not just switching from one “master” to another. It would do good for both China and the US to lose their soft power and have a more level shift of independence among nations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment