you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

With weapons, voluntary training programs (both in terms of participation and guidance), and organization.

If some group of bad actors try to coup your community, you don't just lie back and take it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 49 minutes ago*

    An organization of armed vigilantes fighting against whomever they decide is a "bad actor" wanting to "coup" "their" community? Sounds authoritarian.

    Also, try to be less vague.
    Who decides what a "bad actor" is?
    What makes it a "coup" compared to just a change in leadership?
    What makes it "their" community where it is also not the "bad actors" community?
    What if you don't have any volunteers?
    Where do you get the weapons from?
    Who organises the training and how?
    What happens if a volunteer won't participate in the training?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    Say's who? The community is supposed to just organically resist this? There's no organizational structure? Because that would be a government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 46 minutes ago

    Not to mention the very vague definitions going on.
    Who decides what a "bad actor" is?
    What makes it a "coup" compared to just a change in leadership?
    What makes it "their" community where it is also not the "bad actors" community?
    What if you don't have any volunteers?
    Where do you get the weapons from?
    Who organises the training and how?
    What happens if a volunteer won't participate in the training?

  • source
  • parent