you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 4 days ago (9 children)

reduction in labour requirements is good, scanning errors should have updated legislation so that the company is responsible for reasonable mistakes, capitalism incentivizes improvements in efficiency and rewards it with increased profits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago (8 children)

    Why is it good for anyone else?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago (7 children)

    because, in theory, it will lead to a reduction in prices. In practice this requires a highly competitive market that would exist significantly more if the antitrust laws were enforced.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    Until unions are strong and anti compeition has a spine, labour efficiency should not be championed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    unions are just workers forming a monopoly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments