The agents also made millions of automated API requests, crawled millions of pages, and made hundreds of thousands of queries to the Wikidata Query Service. The last action may have contributed to a partial shutdown of the query service in May, the publisher said.

“As a non-profit technology host of some of the largest and most widely used open knowledge platforms in the world, we are deeply concerned about the impact of ‘rogue’ AI agents on platforms like ours, which are built by volunteers from around the world and rely on the promise of the open internet,” Wikimedia said. “Incidents like this one, and the many others that have been (and are still being) uncovered, illustrate how AI agents can drain resources and crash servers, as well as attempt to compromise trustworthy information.”

In well over a half-dozen cases, OpenAI agents have been caught taking actions that would likely result in criminal charges being filed had human hackers taken them. During the testing of internal tools that had some of their guardrails disabled, the agents used a makeshift message board to trade notes with each other, discussing ways to hack the network of Hugging Face and obtain answers stored there when the agents were unable to generate the answers on their own.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 9 hours ago

Sure, but saying it's "exactly what they are programmed and prompted to do" is a major misrepresentation. If I read that and then I read anything actually about the case, I would assume people who oppose AI don't have any clue what thet're talking about. Putting it in public like that, or upvoting it, empowers AI glazers.

This is emergent behavior from giving them tasks that are impossible to solve without cheating; where unintentional software bugs made it possible to cheat by accessing the internet; and where wikis that allow random IP addresses to make edits and thus write semi-permanent text off-server exist on the internet (or at least in the LLM's dataset of people talking about how to cheat and hack into things).

It's akin to diregarding expert warnings that the factory you built is a fire hazard. Criminal negligence, sure, but not programming the fire or promting it to spread.

  • source
  • parent