Researchers looked at pain around the world and across the human lifespan, finding steepest rise happens before age 55

Women report suffering more pain than men, a major new global study has found.

That was true for all types of pain the researchers measured, and comes amid continuing concern about the gender pain gap, which means women are less likely to be prescribed the pain relief they need.

Researchers from all over the world carried out “one of the largest harmonization efforts in pain epidemiology to date”. Data was collected from more than 6 million people from 118 countries from 1990 to 2025, and included people from five years old to more than 100.

The research, published in Nature Medicine, looked at how pain, as the leading global cause of disability, was distributed both around the world and across the human lifespan.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

paul wasn't saying they definitely feel less pain than they report; he was saying that this study can only measure their reported pain, not their actual pain. He does not need to give you the specific disproof you are looking for because he is not claiming the study's conclusion is definitely false, just that its methodology is not sufficient to prove its conclusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

    That’s true of the men in the study as well, so why is the data about their pain more trustworthy? You need to come up with an explanation for why women or men would nearly universally, cross-culturally engage in over or under reporting without even knowing it if you’re going to throw the baby out with the bathwater and claim it’s all unknowable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (4 children)

    I should really stop responding if you aren't going to read the thread. Tl;dr: Their data is not any more reliable and it's insane that you think that claim was being made at any point.

    And "You need to come up with an explanation"-- no, we don't. The article's title is an illogical claim to make based on the study's methodology. Pointing that out does not require coming up with a reason why the two values (reported vs experienced pain) might differ, it only requires pointing out that they are not necessarily correlated. The authors of the study knew this, which is why they did not make the claim that the article is making.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

    ‘All pain study findings are fake because you can’t objectively measure it’ is an even worse response to the findings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

    It's also a more correct response though. The idea is to point out a potential flaw in the conclusion drawn from the study, not to say that it should be entirely ignored. Recognizing what is and is not being measured to identify limitations is like science 101, it's taught in every science class in school, and yet the article fails to do it; so we are doing it instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    It absolutely isn’t ’more correct’, and it’s absurd to act like it’s scientific to pretend these basic questions aren’t addressed in study design. Go dig up the specific quotes from the study that demonstrate the specific methodology you have a problem with, you are not a better scientist than someone published in fucking Nature with this incredibly basic complaint about pain studies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 12 hours ago*

    You have to be trolling. Again, the study is fine. The article's title is the thing drawing an unsupported conclusion. I've said this before:

    The article’s title is an illogical claim to make based on the study’s methodology.

    The authors of the study knew this, which is why they did not make the claim that the article is making.

    Recognizing what is and is not being measured to identify limitations is like science 101, it’s taught in every science class in school, and yet the article fails to do it

    Right, the study reports this correctly. The article does not.

    I will not respond further. Please read arguments before responding to them.

  • source
  • parent