wizardbeard comments on Open-minded HR

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 93 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Corporate thought also simultaneously believes the reverse:

Things aren't getting done? The team that went from 11 members to 3 while their incoming work rate tripled must not be working hard enough. We should consider outsourcing.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 7 child comments

[–] jackal@infosec.pub 63 points 2 days ago (4 children)

“But… we gave the team AI so they can go faster! Why is everything turning into shit?”

Some executives are so fucking dense.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's because you rise through the ranks through nepotism or by being a sycophant. It is very rarely due to critical thinking skills, intelligence, or mastery of the industry.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

Also the Peter principle

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago*

That is basically the opposite of the peter principle. The peter principle is that you are promoted based on actual skills in your current role, until you reach a role where you do not have the necessary skills

Edit: Misread, I didn't see "also"

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Clearly the team just needs to prompt better. Time to invest in AI training!

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] voidsignal@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

oh! oh! time for a reorg!?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Well not really, because that's like saying women "simultaneously" like to flaunt their bodies and hate having men stare at them. Different women and different managers think differently.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent