you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 hour ago (6 children)

We aren't there, sure. That doesn't mean any LLM generated image is inherently morally wrong or upholding capitalism, just like any hammer isn't upholding capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 51 minutes ago (5 children)

    True, but it is more of about who is pulling the strings rather than who is underneath.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 34 minutes ago (4 children)

    How does using an LLM for a meme support capitalists in any different a way using a hammer does?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 28 minutes ago (3 children)

    If not a local llm, then the input given and the output generated is stored and can be used by the corporates in any way they want.

    Once the job is done, a hammer stays a hammer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 26 minutes ago (2 children)

    So if it's local, it's fine? There's no problem with the fact that it's generated, but who owns the tools, then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 22 minutes ago (1 child)

    I guess yeah? Then It's just a tool to manipulate images just like Photoshop. As I said it's more about who is pulling the strings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 minutes ago

    Gotcha. I largely agree, I think people often see AI images and get a kneejerk reaction on the basis of being AI, not the particulars of how good or bad the image is or the manner in which it was generated.

  • source
  • parent