A review of available techno-fixes leads to two unavoidable conclusions. First, our problem is not just carbon emissions per se; it’s also how we humans inhabit our planet (too many of us using too much stuff too fast). And second, we need non-technological ways of addressing the climate crisis.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 day ago

Pyrolysing is different from combustion. In pyrolysis, oxygen levels are kept very low so the substance does not burn, it merely loses a lot of volatile content and rearranges.

Charcoal is the result of the pyrolysis of wood, and it is formed in small amounts when wood is burned in open air. Pyrolysing a lot would turn the entire thing into charcoal, which the author suggest could then be used in building materials to trap the carbon.

  • source
  • parent