Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine::Google accused DOJ of aiming to force people to use “inferior” search products.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Just because it’s done that way doesn’t mean we can’t fix the issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    It's not "fatalistic", it's "fine" this way.

    A judge doesn't have to know what mozilla is before a trial starts. Council can tell them what it is, how/whether it matters to the case, etc.

    It's the lawyers that have the duty to inform the judge. You can't rely on every judge knowing everything about all topics. And they don't really need to..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments