A review of available techno-fixes leads to two unavoidable conclusions. First, our problem is not just carbon emissions per se; it’s also how we humans inhabit our planet (too many of us using too much stuff too fast). And second, we need non-technological ways of addressing the climate crisis.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Thank you, precisely my point. Nowhere does it say anything like or implying, the combination you mention, which was ‘Wind is intermittent so it can’t be used’ therefore we need ‘household bike generators

In relation to the 3 segments you provide:

  • Wind is intermittent, nobody denies that by itself. It doesn't say not to use it for this reason
  • Then a question?
  • Using renewable energy, not just in high-tech ways, but also through low tech approaches to avoid mining is very different to what you claim they say

Edit: Several, to make things clearer @skibidi@lemmy.world

  • source
  • parent