you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 days ago (5 children)

You misread what I said. If a game creator is using an LLM that was trained with art obtained without consent, that is, the artists were not compensated for that use, why should I compensate that game creator? They don't value the works of others, so I won't value theirs either

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (4 children)

    No artist's work is being directly used. It's like arguing that artists owe Disney or Studio Ghibli money if they learned from watching their animations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    But the artist was supposed to pay in some form to watch these animations because they are not in the public domain

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago

    Agreed. That's why I believe that all business applications of AI should be taxed, and those funds redistributed to the populace. Everyone conceivably contributed, therefore everyone should benefit.

  • source
  • parent