you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

I support this, but I'm curious to know how he defines SUV. I drive a sub compact SUV (Subaru Crosstrek) because it's the closest I could get to a station wagon; they literally do not sell station wagons on the American market anymore.

The only reason I bought a car in the first place was because my wife and I decided to have a kid and we needed a vehicle with some cargo room. We bought the smallest, most fuel efficient option in the market, so I'd be annoyed if I gpt tolled the same as the jack-ass driving a Ford F-150.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    oooo, don't say that too loud elsewhere or you'll have angry people claiming that the Outback is still a wagon, despite not having been one for over a decade now.

    I also had this trouble replacing my third gen Outback. I went with a 2012 Elantra Touring, which has very similar cargo capacity (but lower towing capacity). but it's hard to come by 14 year old cars that aren't rust buckets.

    I can still get a newer BMW, Volvo, or VW wagon, but they're outside of my budget and/or offensive/dangerous (distracting tech, LED headlights, etc). because fuck people who just want a Toyota Matrix, I guess. the VWs were probably the closest to my low budget in the used market

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    Yeah, there are still technically some wagons on the market, but they're $75K luxury vehicles. It's weird, because I only see people with that kind of money driving sports cars or luxury SUVs, but I guess someone is buying them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Tunnels types love their big black throbbing Suburbans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Fuck those things. If you really need to seat 7 people, suck it up and buy a minivan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Simple enough: Index it by weight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Yeah, they mention weight being a possible etermining factor in the video, and if it's done on a scale, I'm happy to pay a little more than a sedan. I'm gonna be annoyed if there's a flat cutoff for weight and I'm paying as much as some truck that takes up two parking spaces.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    People buy bigger cars simply for the tax deduction for their business. My wife has no real need to drive a 6,000 gross weight vehicle but the government awards you with accelerated depreciation for only vehicles over that weight

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Really? I've never heard of this. Is this industry specific?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    https://www.crestcapital.com/section-179-deduction-vehicle-list-over-6000-lbs

    Just has to be used for 50% business use. Also this is n expense offsetting revenue, not a tax credit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    So if you just need a company car to drive to sales calls or something, then you're better off getting some 8-seater SUV than a sedan? I would understand if it were for contractors or farmers to ensure that they weren't trying to write off a Corvette as a business expense, but having that be universal is just dumb.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment