you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Try to have the company run for a week without the janitor and 1 week without the CEO, and everybody would tell you who's doing the most important job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 week ago

    Know you meant this as rhetorical, but I can speak from my own experience.

    Our janitor went on leave for a week without replacement, I can sure tell you I missed them by the end of that week.

    Meanwhile in an old SME job, our CEO left for an entire fortnight to some corporate BS, and genuinely the only tell was the managers being more friendly and relaxed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    It'd be fun to actually have a study to point to. Feels like the type of thing people cloud try.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago

    I think it would be difficult to do it in good faith because the CEOs can subtlely fuck with the results on both ends. Like order other non-janitors to pick up some of the more urgent cleaning/maintenance work to make them seem less important (or maybe offer secret bonuses to people to "just clean up because they like to be helpful" or something). Also order their own subordinates to do crazy (but reversible) things while the CEO is away.

    The same thing I'd expect them to do for experiments with alternate economic systems, sabotage the shit out of it so they can say "see, this won't work!"

  • source
  • parent