Technology

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] FoxAlive@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I've had a few critisims with Bernie with what hes saying about ai recently.

I don't want to discredit him because I feel hes doing what he thinks is best, and honestly is kind of all we got for a big name right now. The people in the anti Ai space that I look up to havent really reached the average American you interact with daily in real life.

I think much like all the other politicians he doesnt fully understand the technology, and hes coming at it from the perspective he always has had. Which is protecting workers from corperations, and pushing for more socalist causes. Which I still think we need desperately, I'm not trying to say otherwise.

What I am concerned about is that Bernie is in some shape or form aiding these Ai companies in some way.

Like pushing for Ai devs who try to create agsi to be sent to prison for 20 years sounds great but then you realize that Sam altman and elon musk agree with him, and you wonder why. Regulation capture? A morally ethical excuse to slow down when ai is hitting brick walls in progress.

And with the idea of a 4 day work week, and ubi. In theory yes I do want those, but if you been paying attention to the conversations around Ai and stuff like ubi you learn that in order for ubi to work they have to remove social security, healthcare, food stamps, low income housing which cost dramatically more than the measly check you will receive every month. Thats my worst nightmare, everyone only gets 600-800 a month and is left to fend for themselves in a world where ai manipulates them with dark patterns into lighting national Forrest on fire so they can get rich on polymarket. Or they have to use the claud slot machine to pay for multiple spins on a chance to get working code for their gig working job, that takes a 30% cut ontop of all the api tokens.

So I'm torn in some ways because I'm worried that the path through all this is riddled with mine fields, and we could some how end up in position worse than we are in now just due to how much people are pushing for ANYTHING right now.

The change I ususally see fit is much more radical and not really realistic, and I don't see the general publics mindset really catching up for a few more years. And in two years the landscape could of changed dramatically.

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

I think it's as simple as the fact that he's old and just doesn't understand the tech and how it's mostly smoke and mirrors. He's probably got malicious people influencing him as well. It's sad but this why public servants need mandatory retirement before they get to this stage.

He's not been 'bought' or anything unless they've convinced him that they'll transfer his mind into an LLM or something so he'll live forever.

Seriously though that's probably going to be a selling point soon. Promising all the sick and dying people of this country a shot immortality (with the power of AI!) in exchange for votes and their life savings. Remember that cryonics scam? Anything to keep the bubble going.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] FoxAlive@lemmy.zip 1 point 3 weeks ago

I'm not anti berni in anyway I don't think hes malicious in any shape or form.

Just now that topic is on ai something I've been a little more tuned into I'm noticing the cracks.

I'd still support much of anything he is pushing for, because frankly he has much more lived experience for me and despite his lack of knowledge in some areas, vastly out performs me in all others.

Theres things in too stupid to understand, I'm not a economist, or a historian etc. I'm just some dude on the internet who spends too much time politicising everything. Maybe I'm wrong about things, and Bernie's one of the few that has earned enough trust with me where I would be blindly faithful. Like if he spearheaded a successful anti Ai, pro socalist movement theres a lot I would kind of feel I have to go along with, just to keep mom/dad or the kids from fighting in the family. If that anology makes sense.

I'd still spout my long winded over opinionated wall of texts on Lemmy and stuff, but I'd vote or go along with things I don't nessisarly agree with if I seemed like it at least brought us a little closer to where we should be.

I still don't trust when people talk about UBI though. (Not us I assume we have the best intentions here, but politicians, news ankers, podcasters, etc) Tell me the plan to make ai pay for it, and ensure me all social welfare service are intact and I'm all for it. But bribing everyone with cash to get rid of health services is insane. These companies have made every little thing as addictive as possible to extract wealth out of you, and that UBI check is just going to end up back in the hands of people like polymarket, fentenal dealers, and fast food companies.

Like we should do things like reducing the cost of fresh fruit and vegetables on food stamps so people could get more benifits while encouraging healthier eating. Instead food stamps have been dramatically reduced and require people to work. Well the poorest of the poor often don't have a home, and due to that they can't work.

What's worse is people like RFK are talking about bringing in labor camps, as if the prison belt wasn't making enough money from forced labor of the underclass. So we are actively creating yet another extractive/exploitative system which profits off of the suffering of the people who have it worst.