you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

ok. i am a firm believer in owning your hardware. its yours, you should be sble to put whatever you want.

but these arent slop kiddies. the exploit was found and reported. yes ai was probably used but noing is putting togethet slop. hell mythos has been unleashed on all major programs. there is a reason microsoft is releasing more fixes in one month that all the months before it this year. everyone is trying to grt ahead before these stronger models are released to the general public.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 hours ago* (1 child)

    there is a reason microsoft is releasing more fixes in one month that all the months before it this year.

    Over half of the fixes are patching bugs from the previous slop-coded patch, and they continue to break Windows

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago

    I mean, maybe, but that’s just speculation. It’s closed source and there’s no way to verify it.

    If AI wasn’t driving exploit research and producing more results than ever, why are Linux CVEs also at record highs compared to years past?

    https://securelist.com/vulnerabilities-and-exploits-in-q2-2026/121091/

    Sloppy coders introducing bugs with AI that they then fix with AI? Perhaps. But there’s plenty of examples where AI is finding exploits in packages that haven’t been touched since AI was invented.

    https://www.infoq.com/news/2026/04/claude-code-linux-vulnerability

    https://www.bugcrowd.com/blog/what-we-know-about-copy-fail-cve-2026-31431

  • source
  • parent