For example, 蠍 is written as サソリ. Even if they use the Kanji in text, they add furigana above it rather than letting the audience themselves decipher the meaning. It's the same with 榊 (サカキ), 仙人掌 (サボテン), 百足 (ムカデ), 蟻 (アリ), 鰐 (ワニ), you get the picture. Why can't they just write them in Kanji without furigana in the same frequency as encountering 本 or 日 upon encountering texts containing these types of words?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In Japanese, when distinguishing between biological organisms, it is customary to write them in katakana.

For example, the biological organism referred to as "人間 / human" is always written as "Hito / ヒト" in katakana.

However, in the case of food products, there is sometimes a convention of writing them in kanji.

For example, in the case of the character for "fish /魚 ," the meaning of the fish is embedded in the kanji (example: 鰻 / eel), which can make it seem more appetizing.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    I wonder if it'd be more likely for an uncommon animal product to have kanji or kana. Like would the packaging for alligator/crocodile be ワニ or 鰐.

    I think because so many fish are commonly eaten people get used to a lot of the kanji but anecdotally there are lots that are still very common in kana on food packages like イカ、ヒラメ、ソイ etc

  • source
  • parent