Many people found it hard to believe that AI researchers think this way. Some explained it as a PR campaign to promote AI regulation, or as self-promotion, or as a way to boost AI company stock prices. Others felt it had to be impossible, because if you really believed this you’d be bombing datacenters instead of posting on Twitter.

In fact, not only do many AI researchers1 seriously believe this, they’ve been thinking and writing about it since the mid-2000s. Eliezer Yudkowsky — the ur-figure for most modern AI safety culture — has been publishing papers since at least 2008 saying that superintelligent AI could destroy all human life. It’s been such a common idea that the AI research community has abbreviated “how likely you think AI is to kill everyone” to “p(doom)” (i.e. the probability2 of doomsday) since around 2010.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

The "Paperclip Maximizer" in all of its absurdity is much closer to the actual worry of the people thinking AI might destroy us than autonomous weapons. Killer drones to me are much more of a cartoon example than something super unspectacular that's equivalent to humanity being an anthill on a plot AI wants to build a house on.

  • source
  • parent