Many people found it hard to believe that AI researchers think this way. Some explained it as a PR campaign to promote AI regulation, or as self-promotion, or as a way to boost AI company stock prices. Others felt it had to be impossible, because if you really believed this you’d be bombing datacenters instead of posting on Twitter.

In fact, not only do many AI researchers1 seriously believe this, they’ve been thinking and writing about it since the mid-2000s. Eliezer Yudkowsky — the ur-figure for most modern AI safety culture — has been publishing papers since at least 2008 saying that superintelligent AI could destroy all human life. It’s been such a common idea that the AI research community has abbreviated “how likely you think AI is to kill everyone” to “p(doom)” (i.e. the probability2 of doomsday) since around 2010.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

because if you really believed this you’d be bombing datacenters instead of posting on Twitter.

No. That wouldn't stop AGI - only delay it at best. That's like pouring water on every person rubbing two stick together thinking it's going to stop the invention of fire.

  • source