you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 12 hours ago (2 children)

Cool, you invaded the privacy of numerous people using AI... you must be proud.

The issue isn't that AI brings no value - it is the cost of that value. And many people aren't falling for the extremely overrated value that companies are claiming. Promised value coming from people who have a very long track record of not being truthful, lying for their own profit no matter who it harms. And then there are some who would rather not ruin the environment for those unfulfilled promises.

But sure, throw an anecdote out to prove everyone else wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 hours ago

    Altman and Musk are verified shit. This is common knowledge all across the industry.

    Public companies don't set their value - shareholders do. Insiders know the value hasn't arrived yet. We build because customers pay us to build. The customer fronts the construction costs based on the signed contract. Investors buy or sell based on public knowledge.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 11 hours ago

    Nobody's privacy was violated. Privacy laws are very strict in Italy and before any research is done on health data you have to sign and tick the box to specifically allow it. The data was also not handed to any company as the research was run by a local university.

    How was anybody's privacy violated? Also I didn't do anything given that I just read this on a newspaper and am not in any way connected to the hospital.

    You are judgmental and ignorant. You think, as many other people here on lemmy, that you are right about everything all the time. I don't deny that the AI industry has very big flaws. I fully agree and I believe that in the long term we will need public ownership of AI companies. I just disagree with the fact that AI is wholly bad and brings 0 positives.

  • source
  • parent