you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

There is probably some technicality in that since it doesn’t record audio, but rather just keeps a transcription - that it might not fall afoul of two-party consent?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Even if it is only temporarily stored to RAM for processing, I struggle to see how that doesn't still count as "recording".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    It probably wouldn’t meet the strict legal definition, as no copy (physical or digital) is left behind for any period of time - as RAM is volatile and its contents disappear on power cycle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments