you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 38 points 13 hours ago (8 children)

In the original (higher res) version of this from back in the day, you could see that his design wasn't even good. The name of the library is on the book spines from right to left, and the left side is wasted space. The middle one is way better. Other entries must have been terrible lol

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 hours ago (5 children)
  • [–] 8 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

    Exactly. Such a strange choice for a library of all things to choose the design with the text that reads the wrong way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 hour ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 54 minutes ago*

    Yes it's the correct orientation for book spines, but the words are still right to left so it reads "Library Public Fullerton". Easily could have been fixed by switching them around and moving them to the left side of the card. Could also make the books progressively smaller so the angle leads the eye in the right direction, or add some shapes to the spine that direct the eye. He's kind of done that with the lean but it still feels wrong when reading it. Would be even better if he stacked the books with the text vertically instead imo.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    You say "Wrong Way" but since the advent of chip cards, more and more are adopting 'vertical' patterns. On top of that, it's a library, of course they choose the one with books on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    And the one that's not clearly designed by a young girl.

    Nothing against that, beyond the fact they're selecting for the broadest appeal possible. He's right, he dominated, but mostly by understanding the audience.

  • source
  • parent