Dear /c/writing community,

I just wanted to let you know that we mods put in place a new no LLMs rule now:

No LLM advocacy. Due to the many ethical problems of current LLM technology, we neither allow LLM-written posts in this community nor do we think discussing the use of LLMs for writing texts in any positive manner is appropriate. Don’t feed people’s works into commercial LLM services either.

Since we're on a solarpunk instance, I assume most people here already found big LLM datacenters run at below cost and with high environmental damage to be too unsustainable. But I thought why not actually add a rule for it.

(I think it should go without saying that AI covers aren't really overly welcome either, but since this community is about writing that seemed like the most pressing concern to address.)

See you around,

Ellie

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 4 days ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 5 points 3 days ago* (3 children)

    I wonder, were there ever any considerations to have anything related as an instance-wide rule for all communities that reside on slrpnk.net? (I'm not sure that's necessarily a good idea, just wondering.)

    I guess I can see some people consider a purely local LLM as some sort of home assistant that's only for personal use, as a slightly solarpunk'ish solution under some circumstances. But the big centralized proprietary services...? Perhaps there's something there that would be useful for slrpnk.net as a whole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    I would love to see an anti-AI rule for slrpnk.net as a whole. Too many gross tech bros who think data centers guzzling water and spewing pollution is somehow compatible with protecting and embracing the environment :/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    We already vet account registrations and so far there was just not really a need talk about a general LLM ban because people here seem to not be much interested in LLMs. Although we did discuss it in the admin chat before mostly in regards to removing remote GenAI communities from the all-feed.

    But we already ban remote bot accounts that are clearly LLM driven and are spamming communities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 days ago

    I wonder, perhaps it would be useful to have a rule banning AI training on any content posted on here? Not that I think it'll necessarily stop anybody, but might as well formally voice opposition.

  • source
  • parent