deadbeef79000 comments on me

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 12 points 6 days ago* (4 children)

The act of signing is what is important, whatever squiggly line ensues is irrelevant.

I remember being told to compare signatures in a retail job long ago. It just meant that my employer didn't understand that either.

permalink

fedilink

source

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah, on discovery they won't say it's the same. They'll just ask if you signed it

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Why would just the act be enough? I could still come around the next day and say I never signed those papers, and the proof is my signatures never look the same? (As a hypothetical, normally you'll have similarities still)

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 6 points 5 days ago (1 child)

Typically there is at least one witness too: the cashier, a lawyer, the other party.

So, when there is a dispute that makes it to a court of some kind there's evidence.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

That's true. 🙂

permalink

fedilink

source

parent