▲ 1025 ▼ LG smart TVs caught logging audio with screen off and snooping on local devices (www.notebookcheck.net) submitted 18 hours ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 225 comments fedilink hide all child comments An investigation by Gamers Nexus found LG smart TVs sweep local networks to map phones and nearby devices. Tests also showed the sets can capture microphone audio with the screen off — they then upload data once reconnected to the internet.
[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 child) TVs shouldn't get internet… permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 point 7 hours ago (1 child) Of course they should. But you should be able to control what it does with that connection. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago (1 child) A TV just needs to be a dumb display and nothing more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 point 6 hours ago (1 child) No. I would never use a TV that isn't connected to a computer. It would be great if that computer was built-in with good peripherals, but only on the condition that the user owns it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago A TV connected to a computer is a dumb display and nothing more. Methinks you're both in agreement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 point 7 hours ago (1 child) Of course they should. But you should be able to control what it does with that connection. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago (1 child) A TV just needs to be a dumb display and nothing more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 point 6 hours ago (1 child) No. I would never use a TV that isn't connected to a computer. It would be great if that computer was built-in with good peripherals, but only on the condition that the user owns it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago A TV connected to a computer is a dumb display and nothing more. Methinks you're both in agreement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago (1 child) A TV just needs to be a dumb display and nothing more. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 point 6 hours ago (1 child) No. I would never use a TV that isn't connected to a computer. It would be great if that computer was built-in with good peripherals, but only on the condition that the user owns it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago A TV connected to a computer is a dumb display and nothing more. Methinks you're both in agreement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 point 6 hours ago (1 child) No. I would never use a TV that isn't connected to a computer. It would be great if that computer was built-in with good peripherals, but only on the condition that the user owns it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago A TV connected to a computer is a dumb display and nothing more. Methinks you're both in agreement. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago A TV connected to a computer is a dumb display and nothing more. Methinks you're both in agreement. permalink fedilink source parent