▲ 219 ▼ In 2009, the plan to pedestrianize Broadway drew opposition from nearly everyone in New York City. Today reverting the street back would be a non starter. (cdn.imgchest.com) submitted 16 hours ago by Fossy@programming.dev to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world 28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 53 points 16 hours ago (3 children) Needs more trees but great progress nonetheless. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago (1 child) Has me wondering if underground infrastructure is an issue. I see shrubs in pots, which is what eventually happens when people are told to plant trees and they can't because there's "too much shit underground." I'm paraphrasing of course, but that's the gist of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 14 hours ago* (1 child) Oh yeah you're probably absolutely correct. With the proper infrastructure it can probably still be done but that definitely makes it more difficult. In those kinds of situations other good options are green walls, vine trellises, etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago With those other good options the building owners are often against. They fear damage to building from roots or plants attaching directly to the facade, although there are many plants where that's not an issue permalink fedilink source parent [–] lntl@lemmy.ml 16 points 16 hours ago (3 children) Agree, maybe green island w trees where the lanes currently are. (Center of street) And then bike lanes between the island and the sidewalks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 4 hours ago I agree with the Dutch guy. The trees should be offset to one side, so the the trees don't obstruct the view as pedestrians and cyclists cross each other in the middle. Also, this bicycle lane probably doubles as access for fire trucks and ambulances. permalink fedilink source parent [–] huppakee@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago My experience as a Dutchie (making me an expert on anything bike-related of course), for the bikers it is really nice if the bike lanes are in the middle because people don't tend to notice they step into 'traffic' if there is a non-traffic island in the middle. permalink fedilink source parent [–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 hours ago There's a subway tunnel immediately under that street. permalink fedilink source parent [–] modus@lemmy.world -1 points 16 hours ago (1 child) And limits on electricity consumption. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 9 points 16 hours ago (1 child) Let's also limit Times Square electricity consumption and light pollution while we're at it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] modus@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago But more Elmo costumes is ok. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago (1 child) Has me wondering if underground infrastructure is an issue. I see shrubs in pots, which is what eventually happens when people are told to plant trees and they can't because there's "too much shit underground." I'm paraphrasing of course, but that's the gist of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 14 hours ago* (1 child) Oh yeah you're probably absolutely correct. With the proper infrastructure it can probably still be done but that definitely makes it more difficult. In those kinds of situations other good options are green walls, vine trellises, etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago With those other good options the building owners are often against. They fear damage to building from roots or plants attaching directly to the facade, although there are many plants where that's not an issue permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 14 hours ago* (1 child) Oh yeah you're probably absolutely correct. With the proper infrastructure it can probably still be done but that definitely makes it more difficult. In those kinds of situations other good options are green walls, vine trellises, etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago With those other good options the building owners are often against. They fear damage to building from roots or plants attaching directly to the facade, although there are many plants where that's not an issue permalink fedilink source parent
[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago With those other good options the building owners are often against. They fear damage to building from roots or plants attaching directly to the facade, although there are many plants where that's not an issue permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 16 points 16 hours ago (3 children) Agree, maybe green island w trees where the lanes currently are. (Center of street) And then bike lanes between the island and the sidewalks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 4 hours ago I agree with the Dutch guy. The trees should be offset to one side, so the the trees don't obstruct the view as pedestrians and cyclists cross each other in the middle. Also, this bicycle lane probably doubles as access for fire trucks and ambulances. permalink fedilink source parent [–] huppakee@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago My experience as a Dutchie (making me an expert on anything bike-related of course), for the bikers it is really nice if the bike lanes are in the middle because people don't tend to notice they step into 'traffic' if there is a non-traffic island in the middle. permalink fedilink source parent [–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 hours ago There's a subway tunnel immediately under that street. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 4 hours ago I agree with the Dutch guy. The trees should be offset to one side, so the the trees don't obstruct the view as pedestrians and cyclists cross each other in the middle. Also, this bicycle lane probably doubles as access for fire trucks and ambulances. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago My experience as a Dutchie (making me an expert on anything bike-related of course), for the bikers it is really nice if the bike lanes are in the middle because people don't tend to notice they step into 'traffic' if there is a non-traffic island in the middle. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 hours ago There's a subway tunnel immediately under that street. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] modus@lemmy.world -1 points 16 hours ago (1 child) And limits on electricity consumption. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 9 points 16 hours ago (1 child) Let's also limit Times Square electricity consumption and light pollution while we're at it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] modus@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago But more Elmo costumes is ok. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 9 points 16 hours ago (1 child) Let's also limit Times Square electricity consumption and light pollution while we're at it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] modus@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago But more Elmo costumes is ok. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] modus@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago But more Elmo costumes is ok. permalink fedilink source parent